Opinion

In what ways can publishing support writers’ emotional needs?

What are emotional needs? Sarah Crossan’s novel provides some insights…

Sarah Crossan’s Young Adult (YA) novel One is, among many things, a marvellous exploration of human beings’ emotional needs. The story is narrated by Grace, one of two conjoined twins: it explores their physical disability in powerful, direct poetry. Grace has go with her sister Tippi everywhere: what is simple for most people is complex for Grace and Tippi: eating, sleeping, moving, going to school, friendships, having a boyfriend all have to be done with someone else right next to you. The novel shows that vital human emotional needs are denied to Grace and Tippi; autonomy, control and privacy are not possible. Other needs such as having status — that is to be taken seriously — are also problematic because of their disability, but this is more about the prejudice of other people and cultural expectations than the disability. This said, the novel shows how Grace and Tippi have something many people don’t have; a huge sense of belonging and connection. Crossan’s narrative explores these emotional needs in a unique and illuminating fashion, and provides all of us with a perspective on our emotional needs.

Writers and emotional needs

It should be noted that Maslow himself did not see these needs as a hierarchy.

The concept of humans having innate emotional needs — as well as physiological ones such as need food, water, oxygen, exercise etc — has been formulated by psychologists and psychotherapists in the century. Perhaps most famously, Abraham Maslow formulated what has come to be termed a ‘hierarchy of needs’ (although Maslow himself didn’t see these needs in a strict hierarchy). Since then, numerous models of human needs have been developed. One of these that has interested me is a psychotherapeutic one developed by an organisation called Human Givens. They have spelt them out in this useful diagram:

From a Human Givens leaflet found here: https://www.hgi.org.uk/sites/default/files/hgi/emotional-needs-leaflet.pdf

The Human Givens approach builds upon Maslow’s and other psychological models, and argues that these emotional needs are innate to humans, and that when these needs are missing in someone’s life then this can cause mental illness. Whether they are innate is debatable in my mind, but for me the model is a very helpful one from which to understand a writer’s needs. In particular, because writing is so linked, in many ways, with publishing work, considering a writer’s emotional needs in connection with publishing offers many insights. It provides a perspective from which to understand how publishing can both meet and not meet a writer’s emotional needs. Many writers suffer from mental ill health, particularly in connection with publishing. The Society of Authors (2023) observe:

More than half of the authors surveyed (54%) said their experience of publishing their debut book negatively affected their mental health. Only one in five (22%) reported a positive experience overall.

Publishing can provide writers with a sense of meaning and purpose

Ministry of Stories wonderful ‘Monster Supplies’ shop.

Many professional writers can have very negative experiences regarding publishing their books, for several reasons: publishers can exploit writers, fail to understand, edit and promote their work properly, put unrealistic expectations on writers to sell their work and so on.

However, publishing can bring a real sense of meaning and purpose for creative writers, particularly in educational contexts. Teachers of creative writing, take note!

In particular, the creative writing charities Ministry of Stories and First Story, which work with children from disadvantaged areas in the United Kingdom, use a pedagogical model which puts the publishing of the children’s work at the centre. Typically, a creative writing tutor will work with a group of children on their stories, poems, scripts etc over a span of a few weeks, a month or even a year (in First Story’s case) and foster meaningful redrafting of work so that it can be published either online or in book form at the end of the teaching period. In such a way, the creative writing tutor builds what Etienne Wenger first termed as a ‘community of practice’ around the notion of publishing the work at some point. Communities of practice are organically run — as opposed to project teams which are much more linear — but they do have end points; for writers, publishing serves a useful point of closure and often brings meaning to the process.

Publishing can support feelings of belonging and connection

The science fiction writer and theorist, Ursula Le Guin, speculated that stories can be ‘containers’ or ‘carrier bags’ for lots of different ‘objects’ — plot devices, characters, settings, images — analogous to our ancestors putting varied tools in a ‘carrier bag’ in order to support their nomadic lifestyles. Crucially, stories are about human beings feeling included in stories, perceiving connections between people and the environment. She critiqued patriarchal ideas of stories where there are always male heroes, conflict, violence, and death. Rather she saw that stories about bringing people together, creating feelings of belonging across cultures, rather than against cultures. Publishing people’s creative work can do this. A book can be like Le Guin’s carrier bag in that books such as anthologies or stories written for, and by groups of people, can help communities connect with one another.

Publishing can nurture status and feelings of autonomy and control

As Philippa East points out in her article about publishing and writers’ mental health for the Society of Authors, a major trigger for writers is uncertainty. She writes:

Many, many things in publishing are uncertain. Will I be accepted or rejected? Will my book sell? How many people will read it? Will they give it a one-star or five-star review? Will my editor leave to have a baby or go to a new job? Will my editorial notes suggest a page-one rewrite? Why did no-one tell me my release date has been moved?

Ultimately, these points are about status and feelings of autonomy and control. Many writers feel that they have a very low status in the publishing process. They are often so grateful to be published that they may well sign contracts that are exploitative. In the academic world, writers are usually not even paid advances or royalties. Despite the fact that publishers have enjoyed greater profits in recent years and the rising cost of living, writers’ incomes have diminished considerably. Publishing work in the modern era is a daunting business because of all the reasons that East lists.

This said, writers have more autonomy and control in some respects than before. It is much easier to self-publish than it used to be, and, in some quarters, though not all, the stigma of self-publishing has disappeared. I have found that self-publishing my study guides through Amazon’s KDP platform has generated much more income for me than I would have done if I had gone to a traditional publisher. Furthermore, I have also discovered that forming a publishing collective, Blue Door Press, has provided me and my fellow writers with more autonomy and control over publishing my fiction than I would have had with a traditional publisher. This is because I have been able to publish work that the group has deemed worthy of publication; there’s been a stringent editorial process, with more emphasis on the quality of the work than how much it might sell.

References

Bolton, G. and ProQuest (2011) Write yourself creative writing and personal development. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

East, P. (2023) Dream job? Or psychological nightmare? London, Society of Authors. URL: https://societyofauthors.org/2023/08/09/dream-job-or-psychological-nightmare/ (Accessed 8/01/2025)

2 responses to “In what ways can publishing support writers’ emotional needs?”


  1. So, I felt pretty passionate that your description of Carrier Bag Theory was reductive or something- I’ve thought about it allot today and I think my issue was that you make it sound like she wants us to mainly try to tell stories that guarantee they will bring cultures together or facilitate peace or something and I think that sells the ideas in Carrier bag quite short- and it puts pressure on us to write “healing” stories. And as she talks about gender difference allot in the essay – there is already allot of pressure that can be put on women to do the healing in this world whilst men fight out the big “important” stuff. I don’t think yours is an exciting enough description of what she is trying to inspire writers to do. If healing and connection are a bi product of telling different stories- that’s great! We need that. And she says clearly that in this messed up world -we need that. And let’s be honest, stories about those who have to be carers -carrying and making food all day – or taking care of the young or elderly or others or themselves- are likely to do less harm in the world than stories about heroes fighting! I think she is clearly saying let’s please think way beyond the very patriarchal and over used story of the individual hero and his journey -of conflict and battles and all of that- that there are these other stories- stories of those who have to just get on with holding worlds together whilst that bloody hero goes off being all hero like! And she is saying we need to tell those other stories- but they won’t always be intentionally about bringing things together or reconnecting things – which is as I say, work that is often left to “women” or other marginalised groups- to do. She says quite clearly she is not a passive benign woman -she says she has rage too- and an urge to fight back -but she has to do that fighting WHILST also gathering and feeding and holding worlds together- and it’s showing that complexity she is talking about- she is not a hero and neither are most people- and the small stories of how we maintain or survive in the world -or the dreams or nightmares we have about the possibility of different ways of living -or tales we have about how bloody damaging living in the shadow of a world that loves a hero can be -or how knackering it is to make heroes their dinner – these “other” stories are vital stories but they can be wild stories and calm stories, quiet or loud ones but -it’s just -the heroes journey is not a part of them. Maybe they are a whole communities story ( The word for world is forest) or the very tired old woman’s story ( her brilliant short story “the day before the revolution”) or a story of the young male carer or an angry exhausted mums story- or the hero who has lost all his power and now just plants bushes and feeds goats whilst the overlooked women hold the true power ( Tehanu) -they are stories that don’t set out to fix or heal anyone intentionally – but if you look closely at them the characters in them probably don’t have much other choice than to be doing some caring and sharing and tending- which is good for us to think about and read about – after all it really is only heroes who get to not do the washing and go out slaying things! Most of us have to do washing whether we like it or not. And telling stories about that is probably where the connections with others will lie – just by telling those stories- I think she’s interested in the washing? And I think I felt grumpy because what’s she is saying is complex and also has real rage in it and you made it sound less complex and mighty than it is -and a bit passive and “maternal” in quite cliched way and I find it much more exciting than that.

    Kate Hardie

  2. I really appreciate this thoughtful response, and you’ve absolutely got a point. My description of the Carrier Bag Theory was reductive, and I can see now how I framed it in a way that risks making it sound overly passive or prescriptive—when in reality, it’s far more radical, complex, and full of rage, as you rightly point out.

    I think you’ve articulated something really important: the idea that these “other” stories aren’t just about healing or bringing people together in some neat and tidy way. They’re about survival, exhaustion, resistance, and the sheer work of holding things together while the so-called heroes charge off into the distance. And yes, there’s an unavoidable tension in the fact that this kind of labour—storytelling or otherwise—is so often expected from women and other marginalised groups, rather than chosen. That’s something I should have drawn out more rather than smoothing over.

    Your examples—The Word for World is Forest, The Day Before the Revolution, Tehanu—all make me want to go back and re-read with this in mind. You’re right that I didn’t give enough space to the full depth of what Le Guin is doing, and I really appreciate you taking the time to lay it out so clearly here.

    Thanks for pushing back—I’ll sit with this and see how I can reflect it better in my thinking and writing.

    Best, Francis

    francisgilbert

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Related reading